TLDR Real P and L channel manager exposes fake trading gurus, emphasizes importance of P&L evidence. Highlights industry's lack of transparency, skepticism towards trading 'gurus', and emphasis on caution and awareness in trading community. Advocates for free resources, backtesting, and black-and-white trading systems. Stresses the need to focus on avoiding losses and risks, questions accessibility of sophisticated financial tools without proper literacy. Discusses deceptive practices in trading industry, including non-disparagement agreements and lack of credibility. Emphasizes importance of objectivity and truth in evaluations.
The importance of requiring traders to show their profit and loss (P&L) statements was underscored by Carl Dom, who sought to elevate industry credibility. Welcoming transparency, Dom insisted on authentic P&L evidence to evaluate traders' credibility, emphasizing the significance of tracking account balance over time to demonstrate consistent performance instead of just isolated successful trades.
The conversation highlighted the need to be cautious and aware of various deceptive practices within the trading community. It brought up concerns surrounding traders' reluctance to show complete portfolios and statements, casting doubt on the claims of trading gurus, including Chuck Hughes, Timothy Sykes, and Stephen Ducks. The focus was on distinguishing genuine traders from questionable ones in the industry.
Participants emphasized the importance of avoiding expensive courses and seeking free resources like Tastytrade, Babypips, and Investopedia. They stressed the need for backtesting and having a black-and-white trading system to evaluate proprietary strategies effectively. Additionally, the impact of market crashes on trading systems and the potential risk of significant drawdowns in accounts were discussed.
The key to successful trading was highlighted as having low drawdowns and focusing on not losing money, emphasizing Warren Buffett's rules. The discussion delved into the risks of leveraging and margin trading, with a focus on considering the market's increasing volatility. It warned against irresponsible trading practices facilitated by advanced financial tools without proper education.
The conversation revolved around the deceptive practices in the trading industry, questioning the lack of transparency regarding performance metrics and backtesting. The participants expressed skepticism about day trading courses and highlighted the conflict of interest in brokerage firms funding studies on trader performance and the impact of commission fees on their business model.
The speaker emphasized the importance of objectivity and truth in evaluating claims made by course providers. They discussed encountering non-disparagement agreements in course purchases and shared experiences of skepticism about the industry's integrity. The conversation concluded with recognition and appreciation for the expertise and efforts of the person they were conversing with.
The speaker's experience of struggling with trading and encountering misleading 'gurus' led them to scrutinize numerous courses and realize the lack of transparency and credibility in the industry, prompting them to emphasize the importance of authentic P&L evidence.
The conversation covered deceptive practices such as unrealistic promises in trading courses, non-disparagement agreements to prevent students from discussing negative experiences, and the trend of unsuccessful investors turning to selling courses without credibility.
The importance of tracking account balance over time, avoiding expensive courses and seeking free resources, the need for backtesting and having a clear edge in trading, the risks of leveraging and margin trading, and the impact of market crashes and commission fees on trader performance.