TLDR Elon Musk's Cybertruck delivery event fell short of expectations as the truck's range decreased, its practicality was criticized, and experts raised concerns about its safety and compliance with regulations. The use of thick stainless steel panels poses safety risks and makes it difficult to cut, repair, and manufacture, raising questions about its crashworthiness and compliance with safety standards.
The Cybertruck's estimated range of 320 miles, significantly lower than the initially promised 500+ miles, raises concerns about its practicality. Additionally, towing or cold weather further impacts the truck's range, prompting potential buyers to consider these factors. While Tesla offers a range extender option, it comes with a hefty price tag, adds significant weight, and occupies space within the truck.
Tesla's emphasis on the Cybertruck's sustainability was met with criticism, particularly regarding the environmental impact of electric cars and Elon Musk's environmental initiatives. Potential buyers are urged to critically evaluate these claims and consider the broader impact of the vehicle's production and usage on the environment, beyond the surface-level sustainability narrative presented.
The Cybertruck's use of 3mm thick stainless steel was initially presented as a feature providing rigidity but later revealed to be up to 1.8mm thick. Experts have raised concerns about safety in collisions, as the unconventional design may not crumple properly. Furthermore, the angular shape and steel thickness may pose challenges in terms of cutting, repair, and compliance with safety standards. Potential buyers are advised to carefully consider the trade-offs between strength and safety in the design.
The truck offered half of the promised range for twice the cost, and the practical range is questionable, especially when towing or in cold weather.
The 3mm thick stainless steel panels were revealed to be made of up to 1.8mm stainless steel, and experts pointed out that it would make the truck unsafe in collisions. The design does not meet pedestrian safety regulations and the steel's hardness and thickness make it difficult to cut, repair, and manufacture.
The new approach was criticized for prioritizing cost and environmental impact over safety and functionality. There were concerns raised about the truck's crashworthiness and compliance with safety standards.